h1

Episodes XVIII, XIX, XX, and XXI

November 9, 2009

This is it: our last set of Jedi training exercises. After today, I will be a full-fledged Jedi Apprentice in the Church of the Jedi, and you, dear readers, will be free from these pointless updates. However, don’t be lulled into a false of security; this is not the last time you will hear of Jediism on this blog. It is, after all, a central part of who I am these days.

Episode XVIII: Deja Do

I have a very bad feeling about this.

Luke Skywalker, Episode IV: A New Hope

The assigned task was to make a “To-Do List.” Didn’t I already do this on day 10? What the what is that?

Episode XIX: No, seriously.

I have a very bad feeling about this.

Luke Skywalker, Episode IV: A New Hope

I was supposed to write the solutions to my “To-do” list?! Like day 11?

Episode XX: This is disappointing

I have a very bad feeling about this.

Luke Skywalker, Episode IV: A New Hope

“Make a start on your to do list.” That sounds remarkably like day 12…

Episode XXI: Finally!

Try to help someone. What a noble goal. Finally, we get something that sounds worthy of a Jedi. It’s no Jedi mind trick, but hey. I’m only an apprentice.

Read the rest of this entry »

h1

8th-Century Prophets, Michel Foucault, and Power

November 5, 2009

In Moyer’s classes, we’re still reading the 8th-century prophets in the Hebrew Bible. I stumbled across these verses in Micah, and it reminded me of something I read for another paper I’m writing this semester:

He has told you, O mortal, what is good;
and what does the Lord require of you
but to do justice, and to love kindness,
and to walk humbly with your God?

The voice of the Lord cries to the city
(it is sound wisdom to fear your name):
Hear, O tribe and assembly of the city!
Can I forget the treasures of
wickedness in the house of the wicked,
and the scant measure that is accursed?
Can I tolerate the wicked scales
and a bag of dishonest weights?
Your wealthy are full of violence;
your inhabitants speak lies,
with tongues of deceit in their mouths.
[1]

Micah is railing against the social injustice of the wealthy and those who cheat one another. Dishonesty runs rampant in Israel, leaving broken victims left in its wake. These prophets come onto the scene after the kingdom splits, when parties and factions are vying for the power that has become associated with Israel’s relatively insignificant and short-lived monarchy. These prophets come predicting exile, “[a] word for what happens when you still have the power and the wealth and the influence, and yet in some profound way you’ve blown it because you’ve forgotten why you were given it in the first place.”[2] Israel has forgotten who they were; they don’t remember Yahweh’s deliverance from Egypt (Micah 6:4) or the oppression they endured as slaves and strangers (Dt. 10:18–19). They have obsessed themselves with power. At this point, I hear the words of Michel Foucault ringing in my head:

in a society such as ours, but basically in any society, there are manifold relations of power which permeate, characterize and constitute the social body, and these relations of power cannot themselves be established, consolidated nor implemented without the production, accumulation, circulation and functioning of a discourse.[3]

Discourse, Foucault suggests, serves as the foundation of power relations that create “truths” capable of ordering society.[4] The power described in the prophets is the oppressive relationship of those merchants who hold the scales to distort the truth, to create new truths based on their influence over their customers. It is the deceitful “violence” of the wealthy. Essentially, the prophets and Foucault are concerned with the same issues of power:

In many instances I have been led to address the question of power only to the extent that the political analysis of power which was offered did not seem to me to account for the finer, more detailed phenomena I wish to evoke when I pose the question of telling the truth about oneself.[5]

Michel Foucault and the prophet Micah are raising questions about the nature of power in society and each individual’s involvement in power discourses. How do I participate in this discourse of power relations? Who do I think that I am? The powerful? Or the one affected by power? For Foucault, power is only truly power-ful when there is the “possibility of resistance.”[6] The masses are not controlled by power unless they give those who crave control the ability to master them. In fact, Foucault says that “power has always been impotent.”[7] For Micah and the other 8th-century prophets, the desire for power and dominance is the myth that has undone the identity of the people of God. In striving for control, the people have violated their covenant with the God who controls everything. The ones who will remain, those with true power, both Micah and Foucault say, will be those who are often considered “powerless”:

In that day, says the Lord,
I will assemble the lame
and gather those who have been driven away,
and those whom I have afflicted.
The lame I will make the remnant,
and those who were cast off, a strong nation;
and the Lord will reign over them in Mount Zion
now and forevermore.[8]


[1]Micah 6:8–12 (New Revised Standard Version), emphasis added.
[2]Rob Bell and Don Golden, Jesus Wants to Save Christians: A Manifesto for the Church in Exile (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2008), 44.
[3]Quoted in Alec Mchoul and Wendy Grace, A Foucault Primer: Discourse, Power, and the Subject (Milton Park: Melbourne University Press, 1993), 59.
[4]Ibid., 64.
[5]Ibid., 59.
[6]Quoted in Michel Foucault, Mauro Bertani, et al. Society Must Be Defended: lectures at the Collège de France, 1975-76 (New York: Picador, 1997), 280.
[7]Ibid.
[8]Micah 4:6–7
h1

The Amos Assignment

November 4, 2009

Every semester, Dr. Moyer has the students re-write Amos 5:21-24 in their own words. I figured I should give it a go, so I could offer my own version to the students.[1]

I really hate it when you get together,
and it doesn’t mean anything to me when you sit around and act spiritual.

Even though you crowd the altar, soaking its steps and rails in repentant tears,
I’m not listening to your sobs and wails;
Your offerings and financial sacrifices are asinine.

Just stop singing;
I’m not interesting in organs or acoustic guitars.

But justice.
Let justice wash over you and flow from you.
Let righteousness be a cool drink for the thirsty.


[1]I should probably note that I am paraphrasing from the New Revised Standard Version, not from the MT. As soon as I find the time to dedicate to a more formal translation, I hope to do so.

h1

I just needed to share this with the world.

November 4, 2009

h1

The Muddled Mess of Marriage, pt. 1

November 3, 2009

I have mentioned before a friend with particular opinions about marriage, civil unions, and same-sex marriage. Recently, this friend has written a paper further explaining his viewpoints on the issue. He is graciously allowing me to engage his paper here at my blog, even to go so far as to post the paper itself for you to read. This makes me very happy for two reasons: 1) It allows the select few who read this blog the opportunity to read someone else’s thoughts (before they read my thoughts on someone else’s thoughts…), and 2) it gives me something substantial to blog about as opposed to mindless dribble, silly ranting, and too much talk about becoming a Jedi. So, without further ado, I present to you:

The Muddled Mess of Marriage

I encourage you to read the entire paper (it’s only 12 pages), but I’m going to break my comments down into a few posts — mostly because I’m already behind on homework and shouldn’t even be dedicating this much time to extracurricular readings and writings.

Micah sets out to avoid religious or legal arguments, instead relying on the sociological history of the “messiness of marriage.” It’s obvious that Micah is trying to forge a middle-way solution in which family values can be maintained while promoting freedom and equality for each and every American without discrimination. Micah’s thesis is:

It is thus my contention that the best way to ensure equality and protect family values is to bifurcate marriage into a two system establishment where the government offers civil marriages to its qualified constituents and religious institutions offer ceremonial marriages to its qualified constituents, thus further extending the separation between church and state (p. 2).

Before this paper, Micah and I had some serious differences about his developing thesis. Initially, he had expressed a leaning towards the language of “civil unions” over that of “civil marriages.” This may seem like a fairly insignificant point of division, but as Gov. Lynch is quoted to say: “I have heard, and I understand, the very real feelings of same-sex couples that a separate system is not an equal system” (Micah’s emphasis maintained). To develop a system of “civil union” seemed to denigrate the fight for equal rights of the LGBTQ community. I always said that it seemed like a concession, and I for one don’t think that the homosexual population of America should be handed a second-rate concession. After all, they aren’t second-rate citizens!

Not only would a “two system establishment” provide equal rights for the LGBTQ community, it would allow the religious of America to maintain their own standards. Churches could decide for themselves what marriages they would “bless” as sacred without legislating their religious convictions on all marriage.

So what do you think?

h1

Episodes XV, XVI, and XVII

November 2, 2009

Episode XV: Clarity

Anakin Skywalker: Where are you going, Master?
Obi-Wan Kenobi: For a drink.

Episode II: The Clone Wars

We were restricted from drinking anything but water. Always a good idea.

Episode XVI: Laughter is apparently the best Jedi medicine, too

Laugh it up, fuzz-ball.

Han Solo, Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back

The great requirement for this day was to find something that made me laugh and to do it repeatedly. I chose to say stupid things in a certain voice. And now that I describe it, it won’t make me laugh anymore.

Episode XVII: Today’s Deathstar

This is Red Five, I’m going in.

Luke Skywalker, Episode IV: A New Hope

“Think of something you want to do or need to do and do it today.”

I did homework. Boring, huh?

So, there you have it. Another week towards Jediism. Four more tasks and a quiz stand between me and Jedi Apprenticeship.

 

h1

The easiest way to save the world.

October 29, 2009

SocialVibe is a partnership between some big name, big money corporations and little, podunk bloggers like me. Basically, I put a widget up (like so ->), you click on it and do a little mad-lib (go ahead), and the sponsoring company gives money to the charity of my choosing. I’ve chosen an organization called Keep a Child Alive. It helps provide treatment to children and families affected by AIDS in Africa and India.

It’s that easy. So, get going. Help some kids.

h1

The Jay Leno Show should be cancelled.

October 28, 2009

Since his return to the airwaves, Jay Leno has accomplished two things: 1) to waste NBC’s airtime, which seems to be their primary objective as a company, and 2) to offend me with both the total lack of humor and a scandalous level of insensitivity that would have gotten Letterman into trouble. The other night, I was watching Leno – it was an act of penance for a particularly grievous sin I had committed earlier that afternoon – when I saw this clip:

Now I might be overly sensitive to these kinds of issues, but it seems to me that this video could be taken as something poking fun of people with autism.

I can admit that I am a flaming liberal, so I basically look for reasons to be offended. I can also admit that I am more likely to read into things like this because of my wife’s current work with kids with autism. But even if you don’t buy that, my second argument still stands:

Leno is not funny, wastes NBC’s decrepit airtime, and ruins their ratings. I honestly feel bad for local news shows that are losing ratings to other local affiliates because of Leno’s failures.

So, I’m begging you, NBC. Do the right thing here. Cancel Leno.

Oh, since NBC probably won’t listen to me: is there anybody out there willing to pick up 30Rock after NBC goes under? Because I want to go to there.

h1

The Bursting of the Academic Bubble

October 26, 2009

About a month ago, I got to sit down over a delicious French press with Doug Pagitt. We talked about life and theology, the Church and culture, and sexuality and creativity. Unfortunately, it wasn’t as laid back and cool as such a description might sound; it was an interview for a research paper I’m writing about “emergent” reactions to the homosexuality debate. In the course of our discussion, Pagitt prophetically declared that I should pursue no further degrees as the “academic bubble is about to burst.”

Just this last week, I watched my friend Phil Snider drink a cup of coffee down at the Coffee Ethic. We discussed many of the same issues. And in the midst of that meeting, Phil prophetically declared that I should pursue a PhD as the emergent conversation has very few scholars and is in desperate need of some.

Personally, I’m torn. I want to continue my education, meaning I’d like to know more than I do right now. But I’m not sure that my motivations for doing these things are any good. Do I just want to be something more for the sake of being something more? Do I want to be some great scholar sitting in an ivory tower somewhere? (I wonder if they serve pumpkin cupcakes in ivory towers…)

Am I narcotically addicted to the change that education used to bring? Lindsey and I often reminisce about the glory days of undergrad where education necessarily meant some sort of ontological crisis. School doesn’t seem to have the edge it used to in my life. Do I need more? Do I want more?

How does higher education jive with what I say I believe about the world? I like to believe that people are people. Is education enough to improve my worth or my ability to contribute to human existence? Don’t I need the educational bubble to burst?

Lots of arguments could be made for the inherent flaws in academia: the arbitrary motivation of grades, the zealous recruitment of students to humanities departments that prepare students only to work in humanities departments that are never hiring, the perceived need for everyone to go to college when high schools are working harder at passing every student and colleges are failing underprepared students out, the accuracy of our current methods of assessment for students with differing learning types, etc. The list could go on. The foundations of our tower seem to be crumbling beneath us, and we are choosing to ride it out carefully for as long as we can as we carefully build our tower higher, over-educating ourselves and losing touch with the people on the ground.

All I know is that I want to do something beautiful with my life.

h1

Episodes XII, XIII, and XIV

October 24, 2009

Episode XII: Problem the Hutt

This bounty hunter is my kind of scum. Fearless and inventive!

Jabba the Hutt, Episode VI: Return of the Jedi

I guess we better solve those problems from days 10 and 11, huh? But you know what’s funny? By the time I got to writing this, I’ve found a whole new slew of problems…

Episode XIII: How do you say “awkward” in sign language?

Why you stuck up, half-witted, scruffy-looking… nerf herder!

Princess Leia, Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back

I had to meet someone new. I met Tim. It was uncomfortable.

Episode XIV: Inner Peace

Fear is the path to the Dark Side. Fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to suffering.

Yoda, Episode I: The Phantom Menace

Avoiding conflict is not easy. But I tried.